Senate Coward Contingent Grows, Becomes Bipartisan

Apparently it's not a good week to be GOP Senator.  Senator Domenici has joined Sen. Lugar, both up til now fairly reliable hawks, in deciding it is their personal political best interest to follow polls on the war instead of win it.  I'm not so sure about New Mexico but I am fairly certain the heartlanders in Indiana, I lived there once, will be none too happy with their Senator throwing in with the likes of Reid, Kennedy, Clinton and their ilk. 

I can't get too disappointed when septuagenarian careerist pols sweat.  In fact it's sort of amusing.  Their conclusion that, after all these years in the Senate, joining forces with the defeatist caucus is there best bet for keeping their job only goes to show one thing; when it comes to politicians no issue is more important than keeping your job.  I suppose it is just a matter of degree depending on the pol.  

Tony Blankley sums it up thusly:

But the debate today in Washington is about none of these strategic concerns. It is exclusively about Washington's political timetable and when the president will bend to such political necessity. For self-admitted politics -- rather than national security -- to be driving decision making in wartime Washington is not only an unpatriotic disgrace -- it is a national menace.


He goes on to imagine what a similar debate might be like during WWII  

FDR: "Sorry. Several senators are feeling very uncomfortable with the war. Frankly, they have just had it. And several of them are worried about their re-election."

Ike: "My men are fighting and dying for yards in Italy right now -- and even so, they can't wait to take the war to Hitler next year in France. Tell those pantywaisted senators to unloosen their girdles, take an aspirin and go to bed -- and leave the fighting to my men."

FDR: "But we could lose the Senate."

Ike:" Better to lose the Senate than the war."

FDR: "I'm with you, Ike. You beat Hitler, and let me beat the Senate 

To RTWT, which I highly recommend
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/the_senate_chamber_of_shame.html

Like Blankley says, to think this conversation even possible during WWII is ridiculous but it is exactly the conversation taking place in DC today.  If only W could muster such straight talk.  But then that's always been his shortcoming hasn't it?

So long as politicians career interests trump sound policy we should know better than to expect better.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.